Nine hundred and thirty‑four pages.
Real calculus, real physics, real code —
woven into fiction.
From 1 + 1 = 2 to the Transformer,
by way of geometry, calculus, algebra,
physics, and Schrödinger's equation —
and a great deal more.
A book that refuses the old divorce
between knowing and feeling:
a story where gods, chaos, a cast of dozens,
and a family of immigrants
come to terms with the modern world.
Let me take the liberty of being explicit: it is a confession, and an accusation — for the two are too often hard to tell one from another.
The reader might have read the great books, the sacred and the celebrated, and noticed who is permitted to laugh in them. Not the hero. The hero suffers, the hero weeps, the hero endures, and we are instructed to call the sequence nobility. The one who laughs — quick of tongue, delighted by his own wit — is nearly always the schemer, the tempter, the figure in the corner sharpening a knife behind their cackle.
Somewhere along its pitiful trajectory, Western civilization made a quiet and catastrophic decision, a decision never undone: it handed the joke to Satan.† Consider the most read book ever assembled. Across its thousands of pages, its central figure — gentle, radical, world‑altering — is never once shown to laugh. Not at a wedding, not among friends, not for the sheer joy of a clever remark well said. When does the divine laugh? In contempt, from a great and terrible height. The mirthful laugh, the laugh of two minds meeting over a good joke, is simply absent, as if surgically removed. They even took the one man born of laughter — Isaac, whose name means he who laughs — and handed him to us solemn.
“Why would anyone abduct laughter?” — you ask. Because a laugh cannot be commanded, and Order despises what it cannot command. Suffering can be assigned. Obedience can be enforced. Sin can be invented and then forgiven, for a modest bribe. But no priest, no king, no political party, no committee has ever successfully ordered a citizen to find something funny. Therein lies the failure, the futility, the irony of command.
And here is what a joke actually is. A joke builds, in a few careful words, a little cathedral of expectation — Order, if I may, tidy and certain — and then, one last word arrives, bringing the whole roof down into Chaos. The laugh is the sound the soul makes when it recognizes the collapse and survives it, delighted. Born of Chaos, wit is merely the architect who knows precisely which pillar to pull.
Do not misread my ambition. I do not despise Order — this book does nothing but worship it, proof by proof. The only kind of Order we should ever allow to exist. The crime was never Order. The crime was the theft of its bride. They kept the groom — discipline, suffering, obedience — and they murdered the bride — Laughter, Chaos, Freedom — and then called the widower holy. A civilization that suffers without laughing is only half alive, knows it, and resents you for noticing.
That's what this book is all about: to hand back what was stolen. Wit is not the villain's weapon; it is the highest form of rejoicing our species has invented — the freest act a lung can do — higher than the feast, higher than the anthem, for those ask nothing of you, and a joke demands a free and racing mind. To laugh at wit is not cruelty. It is worship. And to teach a person to distrust their own laughter is to chain them, gently and for life, to the most useless rules a society ever wrote.
Laughter answers to nobody. It is the first and last free country. I know of no other, no truer forebear of freedom. Enjoy your laughter, dear reader, for it has never been and will never be Satan's luxury. It's ours.
† The suspicion runs old and deep. Plato, in the Republic, would police laughter as a loss of self‑command. The medieval Church distrusted risus outright and ruled its monks against it — a distrust Umberto Eco made the engine of The Name of the Rose, in which the lost second book of Aristotle's Poetics, the one on comedy, is poisoned so that no man may learn God can be laughed with. Hobbes defined laughter coldly as “sudden glory,” a spasm of superiority. Kant called it “the sudden transformation of a strained expectation into nothing.” “Nothing!?” — what an insult to injury. Chaos it is, the raw material every act of creation demands. Meanwhile, the canon's wittiest tongues are reliably its villains: Milton's Satan, Shakespeare's Iago, and Richard III, every cackling descendant down to the Joker; while the hero is pious Aeneas, dutiful and unsmiling. Even Scripture reserves its laughter for scorn — “He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord holds them in derision” (Psalm 2:4); “the Lord laughs at the wicked, for he sees his day coming” (Psalm 37:13). The receipts are consistent.
As for the many, many threads of thought that criss‑cross within the covers of this book — for example, one being the glorification of the sacred bond between a man and a woman, a bond humbly kept intact by the bulldozer as the greatest asset the Universe will ever have — another one being the celebration of the power of proof; each upon the last, they have brought our civilization to its present technological state — and then there is one that rests comfortably on the other end of the dimension of jubilation.
As wars and crimes have subsided in the beginning of the XXI century, a surprising novel phenomenon has blanketed planet Earth, taking stage in style and with notoriety: assholes. In its present form, humankind near‑optimally discovers, propels, empowers, and crowns the asshole. Religious scripts, laws and constitutions, hierarchies of power, media, virtually every thread of societal enforcement rolls the red carpet for the passionate asshole to swiftly take over. The greater the asshole, the smoother the ride. And how does the average human respond to this prolific emergence? With reverence — for they hope that one day, with a mild strike of luck, a miracle of some sort, they too can show their unfaltering assholeness to this world. Even surpass the present‑day flag‑bearer of jackassery. It appears we have all turned into assholes. Wow!
What is an asshole?
Let us define them properly, for a subject left undefined cannot be fought. An asshole is a person who has decided, deep in the private engine room of the soul, that both the written and unspoken rules must bend for them and stiffen for you. They take the bigger half and name it fairness. They arrive late and name it importance. What they do not know, they declare inconsequential. They step upon your foot and wait for you to apologize — and here is the miracle of the age — you do. The asshole wears every gender, every race, every flag, every faith. It is, perhaps, the only true and perfect diversity our species has yet achieved. And there is nothing curbing the asshole. Except for another, greater one.
We split the atom and fused it back, photographed the electron and the black hole, discovered the spread of dark matter all across the Universe, made it possible for any two people on Earth to talk at any time. Or… or seek for the answer to any question they might imagine. Magnificent, you say! And yet — I must report to you a defeat. For all its trumpets, the march of technology is a slow snail beside the unstoppable, inevitable march of assholery. Illuminating some minor traces of this amorphous, yet blunt parade, and handing the asshole the honor of the label, it is one of the very many holes this manuscript aims to fill.
Sixty‑seven topics, derived rather than cited — geometry, calculus, probability, electromagnetism, thermodynamics, cryptography, relativity, neural nets — and a hand‑corrected index of 711 entries you can search.
See everything the book covers
A monopoly so overwhelmed by the Peter Principle it would long ago have ceased to exist had it not been a monopoly. Mr. Glossman’s visionary slides. A ski retreat nobody wanted. The politics of a firm where the engineers have no say, and everyone can see it.
Read the chapter